THE ELECTORAL PROCESS

February 7, 2003

HISTORICAL CONTEXT

1987    The first elections under Haiti’s new post-dictatorship Constitution, in November 1987, were aborted by a military/paramilitary massacre at voting polls in  Port-au-Prince.

1990    Three years later, December 16, 1990, Haiti organized its first free and fair elections. Parish priest Jean-Bertrand Aristide was elected president with an overwhelming 67% of the vote among a field of 13 candidates.

1995    Elections were held for president, all seats in the House of Deputies and ⅔ of the Senate.

1997    Elections were held for the remaining third of the Senate, for the House of Deputies, local mayors and local councils.

2000    In May 2000, a record amount of candidates (29,500) competed for a record number of seats (7,500), legislative and local. A record number of citizens registered (almost 4 million) to vote, and a record number (over 60% of those registered) voted. Six months later, November 26, 2000, elections were held for ⅓ of the Senate and President. From a field of 7 candidates, Jean-Bertrand Aristide was elected with 92% of the vote.

Controversy Surrounding May 21, 2000 Local and Legislative Elections

 
The only institutional flaw identified by the Organization of American States (OAS) in Haiti’s May 21, 2000 legislative elections was the interpretation of the electoral law adopted by the electoral council to calculate the percentage of votes obtained by 8 senatorial candidates. Nowhere in its electoral report does the OAS suggest that the entire election involving 29,500 candidates vying for close to 7,500 seats be redone, or that there was widespread fraud or misconduct that would call the election into question. Indeed, the elections were heralded as a “great success for the Haitian population.” One observer, U.S. Congressman William Delahunt said, “the strengths so far have been the lack of violence, the huge level of participation, [estimated at 60%], and the relaxed atmosphere.” The claim today that the May 2000 elections were “flawed” or involved “fraud” obscures the small number of contested elections and the methodological issue at controversy. To the great detriment of the Haitian people, the “crisis” that has developed between the May 21 elections and now has been allowed to spiral beyond the scope of the OAS electoral report, become a platform to block the democratic will of the majority of Haitian voters and is the pretext for preventing the flow of up to $500 million in development loans and assistance to Haiti.

ActionS taken by President Aristide and the Government of Haiti to Resolve the Electoral Controversy 

Although the controversy surrounding the seven senatorial seats occurred in an election prior to President Aristide’s presidency, he has taken the following action to resolve the crisis:

-        In July 2001, at President Aristide’s urging seven of the senators whose first round victories were questioned, submitted in writing their unequivocal resignations from the senate. (The controversy surrounding the eighth senator was mooted by his reelection).

-        All remaining senators elected on May 21, 2000 agreed to reduce their terms by two years.

-    All the deputies elected on May 21, 2000 agreed to reduce their terms in half.

-     President Aristide secured the resignation of all 9 members of the provisional electoral council to make way for a broad-based council with representation from the political parties of the opposition.

-     President Aristide has declared 2003 an electoral year and has repeatedly met with the opposition to urge their participation in the elections and in the creation of a provisional electoral council.

-     On February 7, 2002, the President published a decree naming seven of the nine members of the new CEP. Convergence and the other political parties of the opposition continue to refuse to participate in the process and did not submit candidates to the CEP, leaving two vacant seats. A previous accord provides a mechanism for filling such vacancies on the CEP, though this replacement process has not yet been put in effect. The named members, however, will not assume their duties until the Cour de Cassation, Haiti’s highest court, swears them in. The nominating sectors have not yet agreed when they will allow their nominee to take the oath office. This may be another unfortunate delay in the process toward early elections in 2003.

  -      The Special Representative of the OAS in Haiti, David Lee, reiterated, during the process toward the formation of the CEP, that the regional body remains attached to Resolution 822, which foresee early legislative elections this year.

 
POSITION MAINTAINED BY THE CONVERGENCE A PLATFORM OF OPPOSITION PARTIES

-        The so-called “option zero” - that President Aristide resign and that the entire May 2000 legislative elections be re-done.

-        Opposition to President Aristide’s repeated and continued calls to participate in the formation of a new provisional electoral council to organize early elections.  

 

<-- Previous


| Main Page| |General Information | |Government and Society| |Links on the Web |
| Business and Economy | |Tourism and Travel | |Visa Regulations | |Documentation |

©2003 Copyright Embassy of the Republic of Haiti